hi,
i have on my screen painter 2 Radio_Buttons and an input field, so i want to make this field disabled when the second radio_button is not initial so
how can i make this output/input field disabled (in screen painter).
hi,
i have on my screen painter 2 Radio_Buttons and an input field, so i want to make this field disabled when the second radio_button is not initial so
how can i make this output/input field disabled (in screen painter).
Hi - I have written query like below.
SELECT bkpf~bukrs bkpf~belnr bkpf~gjahr
bkpf~bldat bkpf~budat bkpf~monat
bkpf~awtyp bkpf~awkey bkpf~blart
bsis~buzei bsis~buzid bsis~shkzg
bsis~dmbtr bsis~hkont bsis~bschl
bsis~werks bsis~xref3 FROM bkpf INNER JOIN bsis
ON bkpf~bukrs = bsis~bukrs
AND bkpf~belnr = bsis~belnr
AND bkpf~gjahr = bsis~gjahr
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE gt_bkpf_gr
WHERE bkpf~bukrs EQ '1000'
AND bkpf~bldat IN s_bldat
AND bkpf~budat IN s_budat
AND bkpf~blart EQ 'AB'
AND bkpf~glvor EQ 'ABCD'
AND bkpf~xreversal EQ space
AND bsis~hkont IN s_hkont
AND bsis~buzid EQ 'P'
AND bsis~werks IN s_werks
AND bsis~dmbtr IN s_dmbtr.
gt_bkpf_gr is a Hash table. here we are always passing the Company code(BUKRS),posting date(s_budat),and G/L account(s_hkont).
For 73 entries it is taking 13 mins.Is there anyway to redesign the above query such that it will improve the performance.
Hi abapers,
my Requirement is When we execute the MD04 Report (Stock/requirements List), we want a new button as “Operation location” in the Layout header.
Once the User selects the Operation location, a new column with the expected values to be displayed at item level.
i.e., once you click on the above fields on the layout, then the respective column should appear and upon reclick it should vanish from the screen. for clearance pl check screen shots
Hi,
I am trying to add a button in an existing GUI screen (earlier copied from standard GUI status). When I am trying to add a button in the application toolbar, its showing me the following error.
Function code &REJ has not been assigned to a function key
Message no. EC181
When I am trying to create a button for the same scenario in IDES its working properly...
Please let me know what to do.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
ravi.
Hi Experts ,
I am trying to insert employee HRA details using the standard FM HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION . My issue is that the METRO field of P0581 structure
is not updating when passed value equals to '1' ( METRO = '1' and NON-METRO = ' ' ). All other fields of the infotype are updating correctly .
I even tried passing hardcoded value in debug mode , but the value remained NON-METRO (blank) . Has anyone faced such issue ?
Kindly suggest .
Regards
Abhishek
Hi Experts ,
I am facing a dump when trying to insert records for 0580 infotype using the FM HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION. I am populating 4 currency fields like GRSAL ,PFTAX with amounts for an employee and calling the FM , However on executing , I get a short dump on Commit in the standard program .
However , the same code works fine for other Infotypes like 0581 etc . Please suggest .
Regards
Abhishek
Hi experts, I have a request.
I wonder if you can do this:
When an order is generated are filled a Z fields in the additional data B, and when a bill for the VF04 is generated you want to search orders created previous mind that are not billed by the area of sales, customer and a Z-field order.
Let's say a customer has two sales documents, and that the two documents the value of '102325' in the ZZCBL field in the additional fields B, and that has the same area of sales, and you want that at the time of billing, the two documents are consolidated into one with all their positions. I print documents in a SmartForm.
Hello,
is there a Link between the tables IBIB and IBSP? On which fields?
Or is any other table between them?
Thanks in Advance!
Is it possible to extend the context menu of the SE80 ABAP editor, such that I could highlight a certain piece of code, right click on it and have a custom context menu entry for e.g. sending the code snippet to a report (prepared variant) like AFX_CODE_SCANNER ?
Or does anyone here have experience with the SAP GUI Scripting and can tell me whether above mentioned idea is implementable with that?
Hello,
I had created an infoset and using this infoset I had created a query . Now I want the output field sequence to be controlled. Is there any way that I can control the output columns order. Like for suppose I have columns a b c d the default way which SAP is proposing.
I want the output in columns b d c a , could you please suggest on this.
Thanks,
RG
Hi All,
Iam trying to execute a code
LOOP AT <fs_outtab> INTO <fs_line>.
DO .
ASSIGN COMPONENT sy-index OF STRUCTURE <fs_line> TO <fs>.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
EXIT.
ELSE.
lv_data = <fs>.
CONCATENATE lv_string lv_data INTO lv_string SEPARATED BY ','.
ENDIF.
ENDDO.
* CONCATENATE lv_string lv_text INTO lv_text IN CHARACTER MODE SEPARATED BY ','. .
TRANSFER lv_string TO lv_filepath.
Clear: lv_string ,lv_data.
ENDLOOP.
After the TRANSFER statement i get an message .
SAP system message.
Work process restarted session terminated
Is the issue is with the code ?????
Hi experts,
I have two tables tab1 and tab2 with two common fields tab1key1 = tab2key1 and tab1key2 = tab2key2 . My goal is to find out all entries that are in tab1 and but not in tab2.
How can I achieve this in an efficient run?
Please some simple code examples.
Thanks
Hello All,
We are trying to populate CnTy column on sales order line item. I have tried to use implicit enhancement within form KOEIN_ERMITTELN_N46. However, the condition values for each line gets over written by the last value populated in field KOMV-KSCHL and thus all line items carry the same condition type values.
If anyone has done it before or suggestion to resolve it, please share.
Thank you!
Hi,
I am working in a program using parallel processing and the time between the function module calls are being around 4 seconds.
Example:
WHILE....
MESSAGE 1
CALL FUNCTION 'ZZZZ' STARTING NEW TASK 'task' DESTINATION IN GROUP 'group'
PERFORMING 'form' ON END OF TASK.
.
.
.
MESSAGE 2
ENDWHILE.
The time between message 1 and message 2 varies in seconds but never less than 3 seconds. The return code of the function call has been always 0 and there is no problem with lack of resources.
I implemented another test program in a different environment and I am calling a dummy function module 15 times in parallel, all of the calls were triggered in the same second.
Someone has experienced something like this?
Thanks,
Felipe
Hello team.
I have a problem. In the SP01 we send the spool order to other user.
Thats its correct. The problem is when Run the Job to delete the Old spools. this last spool order is deleted.
This is because when use the SP01 to send the order to other user is no filled the field TSP01-RQDELTIME.
Then I need Red the spool and copy this spool order to other User and copy the value RQDELTIME.
Do you know some FM to do it?
Best Regards
Hi All,
I would like to know whether there are any settings to move an Idocs status from '03' to '12' without any programs(Manually changing the status with the help of programs) or any background jobs.
Please kindly let me know.
Thanks in advance,
Divya.
Transaction FILE is used to maintain logical path / file names and it's a cross-client customizing. I've noticed a rather odd thing in it. We have two DEV clients: one allows cross-client customizing changes and the other doesn't. I ran FILE in the client where the changes were not allowed, got a bunch of messages and transaction opened in display (sic!) mode. This part is perfectly fine.
Then I ran a test and realized a change was needed. So I logged into the other DEV client, where changes were allowed, and ran FILE transaction. Much to my surprise, I got a message that the data is locked by <my user ID>. After checking for other open sessions, I realized that when this transaction is opened in display mode, it locks the data. In this situation it's, essentially, a deadlock, because I cannot possibly change the data where it's locked because of the client setting. But in the client meant for changes I can't change it either because it's locked.
I tried this in an EHP6 system, you might be able to see this too in any QA system - locks are visible in SM12. As soon as you go to FILE, the locks appear, even if you are in display mode:
I checked some other configuration transactions out of curiosity and found no locks applied in other cases.
Trying to be a "good SAP citizen", I opened a low incident on this. But so far AGS a) claimed they can't recreate the issue b) accused me of trying to open the transaction for changes in two sessions (not the case) c) claimed the behavior in display mode is "as designed" (no further explanation as to what's the purpose of such design).
Well, maybe I'm the crazy one, so thought I'd ask here. Does anyone see why would FILE transaction need to apply a lock in display mode? This seems to go against the basic transaction design principles IMHO.
Thank you!
Hi ,
I have created one ztable with two columns. I want unique records in both columns. As we know , table can have one primary key , i have set first column as primary key . For second column , i have created unique key . But when i enter duplicate record for second column , it is throwing dump of duplicate record . Is there any way to handle this dump .
Regards
Jagjit Singh Saini